[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)

  • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:42:57 -0500

Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> I repeat: all this noise about the difficulty of validation is
> completely missing the real point, namely we have neither a theoretical
> basis nor industry experience to guide us in constructing and using
> compound schemas (DTDs or any other sort), and doing partial validation.

I believe that we have both industry experience AND a formal model.

The industry experience is that people can build compound schemas by
combining schema parts through *parameter* entities. I highlight the word
*parameter* because it is the hint to how a more robust solution must
work: it must parameterize content models and schema fragments. The
problem with parameter entities is that they are way too flexible because
they work at a textual level. We have the right model, but the wrong
mechanism. So to move beyond that, we must implement parameterization in a
more structured sense. 
--
The so-called "module proposal" did the same thing with SGML DTD syntax.
(it uses a not-sufficient-constrained variety of parameter entities,
however).

http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/document/1987.htm
http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/document/1982.htm
--

The formal model is the forest automata theory. See:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/1998Mar/0017.html

This post shows how to do parameterization and composition. 

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

The past is inaccurate. Whoever lives long enough knows how much what he
had seen with his own eyes becomes overgrown with rumor, legend a
magnifying or belittling hearsay. "It was not like that at all!" -- 
he would like to exclaim, but will not, for they would have seen only 
his moving lips without hearing his voice. - Czeslaw Milosz (translated)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.