[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
At 06:32 PM 9/10/98 -0400, Richard L. Goerwitz III wrote: >It's unbelievable, but people are already talking about legacy XML and >about the abandonment of SGML. Is it any wonder that vendors like Micro- >soft seem to be sitting on the fence? We have some people who declare >firmly that DTDs are the only accepted schema/validation mechanism. And >we have other louder, stronger voices who are already declaring them dead. I'd like to disagree with the perception that people are not in favor of validation. Early users of XML, it seems, typically want *more* validation than SGML offers, rather than less. That's why there's so much energy going into the early stages of the new-schema design. Yes, we need DTDs, but also, we need more, and we need it PDQ. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|