[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSchema: Sections 5.0 and 5.1
John Cowan wrote: > Ron Bourret wrote: > > > [1] XSchemaPI ::= '<?xschema' S XSchemaID S? '?>' > > Why the funky lower case? "XSchema" here as elsewhere. I started with XSchema and then thought xschema was easier to type (says he who proposed mixed case element names). I'll change it. > Also, there can be S after the "<?". Not true. See production [16] in the XML spec. > > [2] XSchemaID ::= 'xschema' Eq SystemLiteral > > Some provision needs to be made for a PubIdLiteral as well. I wondered about this. I'll change the xschema in [2] to SYSTEM and add a production for PUBLIC. Two questions: 1) Are there any conventions in PIs for use/no use of equals signs? 2) Do we always require a system identifier or are the choices system / public / both? -- Ron xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|