[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML errors and fatal errors.
Richard Tobin wrote: > > > I find also the following 20 kinds of non-fatal errors: > > Many of these are violations of the grammar, hence making the document > not well-formed (because it doesn't match the production "document"). Yeah, it's ugly. The claim that a document is WF if it conforms to the production "document" appears in clause 2.1 and is repeated in clause 4.3.2, but is not as such a WFC, and clause 1.2 claims only that violations of WFCs are said to be errors. So technically a document like <foo though not WF, is not "in error", since neither "error" nor "must" is anywhere applied to what is wrong with it. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|