[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Namespace Processing Hints and Rant on Scoping/Defaulting

• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:55:37 +0900

David Megginson wrote:
> That said, I still really HATE the new declaration namespace syntax
> and the scoping/defaulting, but for reasons other than the problem of
> DTD validation: the whole thing reminds me too much of my first early
> experiences with BASIC, assembly language, etc., when people were
> writing giant, monolithic programs to avoid the supposed overhead of
> function calls.  Today, some people want to build giant monolithic XML
> documents to avoid the supposed overhead of multiple HTTP fetches.

I agree on this feeling.  I also think that the new WD makes an 
XML document monolithic.  Since the namespace of an element can be 
declarared by any of its superiors, we can no longer "divide and 
conquer" XML documents.  (Fragment validation is no longer possible.)

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Namespace Processing Hints and Rant on Scoping/Defaulting
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace Processing Hints and Rant on Scoping/Defaulting
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces and XML validation
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace Processing Hints and Rant on Scoping/Defaulting
• Next by thread: Re: wd-xml-names: external dtd subsets (and external entities in general)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread