[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Namespaces and XML validation

• From: Lisa Rein <lisarein@f...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 15:13:29 -0700

peter murray rust wrote:

> 
> As I have often
> (probably boringly) said, I think my community is far more interested in
> semantic than syntactic validity. (Actually they probably don't care about
> either much...)


How can you possibly have one without the other?  If your syntax is
bogus -- you won't get far with semantics.  How can you?  

Am I wrong?  Somebody please set me straight.

lisa rein

http://www.finetuning.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • Re: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schemas and Other Crucial XML Questions
• Next by Date: Re: Offtopic: Web Standards Project
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces and XML validation
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces and XML validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread