[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: C++ XML Parser
At 11:55 16/07/98 +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > > >DXP seems to be much slower than the other XML parsers, and informal >tests done by myself at home had XP parsing documents about 10 times >faster than DXP. (This test was done on only a single large document >and with previous versions of both parsers, so your results may be >different.) > I have been using DXP for validation when required and have found that it is not only slow but can throw OutOfMemoryError for large documents. This is with a version about 1998-02 - I am not clear whether there is a later one. [I didn't find a SAX1.0-compliant one last time I looked.] I normally use AElfred as my non-validating parser under SAX and have switched to using xml4j for the validating parser which has managed an 11 Mbyte document for me without problems. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|