[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 14:35:37 -0400

james anderson scripsit:

> as noted above, syntax would not be sufficient. in any case, a name encoded as
> a string must, at some point, become a universal identifier.

Agreed.

> it makes no sense
> to delay this operation,

It makes every sense to delay this operation until we know just which
attribute values represent names.  Blindly interning every attribute
value just in case it's a name, and worse yet, assuming that every
attribute value of the form foo:bar *is* a name, is inefficient
and perhaps incorrect.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• References:
  • Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PCDATA vs CDATA
• Next by Date: XSchema: Namespace PIs in XSchemas considered harmful
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 1 (Namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread