[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: NOTATION FPIs (was: <XML:SCRIPT>)

• From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 15:31:46 +0100

->Anyway there is a general expectation in XML that system
identifiers should
>be URIs  and that public identifiers should be SGML FPIs.

I will be pedantic again. There may be a general expectation
among the XML congnoscenti, but there is no general
expectation "in XML", or in the wider community who assume
that XML is what the published standard says it is, nothing
more and nothing less.

Because the XML standard says so little about what a "Public
Identifier" is (and in particular, doesn't constrain it to
be either public or an identifier), we can expect to find
different sub-communities using them in all kinds of
different ways.

Certainly XML doesn't contain any rule to stop me using the
characters "IANA" in my Public Identifier, and if the rule
is written somewhere else, then I'm afraid I haven't read it
and don't feel bound by it.

Mike Kay


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: NOTATION FPIs (was: <XML:SCRIPT>)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XLF: Legacy Log Problems
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Spec - Content Model Declarations (Section 2.3), Draft 4
• Previous by thread: Re: NOTATION FPIs (was: <XML:SCRIPT>)
• Next by thread: RE: NOTATION FPIs (was: <XML:SCRIPT>)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread