[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces: prefixes vs. no prefixes
At 14:32 28/07/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >Ron Bourret wrote: > >> This is undoubtedly a no-brainer, but it has just now occurred to me that the >> following two DTDs are almost certainly not the same. >> >> <!ELEMENT A (B+)> >> <!ELEMENT B (#PCDATA)> >> >> and >> >> <!ELEMENT FOO:A (FOO:B+)> >> <!ELEMENT FOO:B (#PCDATA)> > >IMHO they are not, since the current namespace draft provides no >way to declare the meaning of unprefixed element names. I'd recommend waiting for the next version of the namespace spec before analysing the 1998-05 draft too deeply. RSN, I believe. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|