[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.3, Draft 1
At 16:43 11/06/98 UT, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >This one is much longer than its predecessors, for which I apologize. I have been away for a week and am still ploughing through the list traffic, but from a brief glance I am really impressed with the way the discussion is structured. Simon, Do you mount the sectional proposals on your site? [Yes, I could find out by looking, but it would be useful for the list to know.] One thing I really value about the current project is that it includes contributions from both the SGML community and those who have come to XML without previous experience (I assume). This means we get a cross-fertilization of ideas. Everyone is working hard to avoid re-inventing things that are 'well known' in SGML but also looking at other ways of expressing them. As always, simplicity will be key. FWIW I read this section and it seemed to be very clearly presented and doesn't require comment from me. The length is primarily because each component is addressed at the same level of detail which is what is required in a technical specification. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|