[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces and Parsers
Peter Murray-Rust wrote: > > - Xpointers. This is more serious. XPointers locate elements and > attributes by the occurrence of QNames in the document. Thus > descendant(1,FOO:foo) > will *not* find anything in our example instance. Since 'most people' agree > that the prefix has no formal standing, perhaps XPointer V2.0 (or even the > latest revision) could allow UniversalName substitution. I think this would > be extremely valuable and do not see any serious downside (given that we > are implementing namespaces anyway). XPointers, XSL, XSchema and most other XML processing specs will have to be updated to be namespace aware. This should probably done in version 1.0 of those specs. That explains the urgency of the namespace proposal. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Three things are most perilous: Connectors that corrode Unproven algorithms, and self-modifying code http://www.geezjan.org/humor/computers/threes.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|