[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSchema Spec Section 2.3, Draft 1

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Jun 98 12:36:30 UT

John Cowan wrote:
>That was my original design.  Ron thought it was clearer to allow
>an explicit PCData element equivalent to an empty Mixed element,
>and I acquiesced.

For now, I'll leave it.  Ron's away for a couple of days, and we can discuss 
it when he gets back.

>It occurs to me that the Mixed element should have a
>Frequency attribute declared #FIXED "ZeroOrMore".
>It *is* "built in", which is why it can sensibly be represented by a
>#FIXED attribute.  That way, people can see Mixed, Seq, and Choice
>as adhering to a common "frequency architecture".  Just a thought,
>not anything I'm fanatical about.

The more I think about this, the more I like it.  I'm a little leery of using 
fixed attributes in XSchemas because I doubt that they will have much meaning 
for processors, but they can certainly show the way.  While I wouldn't reduce 
Mixed to a Seq in the XSchema, I can see where it might well be convenient for 
a processor to do so.  I'll put it in.

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Another member of the family
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.2, Draft 1
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema Spec Section 2.3, Draft 1
• Next by thread: RE: XSchema Spec Section 2.3, Draft 1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread