[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: What are schemata
To give an example. As far as I can think we might end-up with a framework of Context's. Each Context is a sub-domain model with its own set of Concepts, Terms and rules. In any (medical) document each one data item will be surrounded by Tags relating to each of the 6 Context subdomains. Several parts of the sub-domains can be coded according to several codingsystems. Each with its own DTD. SO it can be that there is one FrameWork-DTD and several optional DTD's in each subdomain model. In general I can see a FramWork of 6 SubDomains (Context's) - Real World Place, things, people, etc - Document World author, owner, etc , etc - Narrative World the way we tell or write stories - Topic Model World In the case of medine : diagnosis, findings, complaints, etc - Legacy systems - Business world Protocols, worlkflow Greetings gerard Freriks ps: In the case of medcine I would call it : MeSpeak At 20:23 +0000 31-05-1998, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >Tim Bray wrote: >---------------------------- >Hmm, this line of thought may be perpetuating what I see as one of >the shortcomings of DTDs, namely that the DTD has to describe the >whole document, i.e. a class of languages. What about partial >validation/constraints? I think it's important that child-of-DTD >support compond documents & partial validation. So in the terms above, >maybe these things define sets of elements and attributes, rather >than whole documents. >----------------------------- > >I think focusing on elements and attributes is an excellent idea. I'd >like to >see XSchemas applicable to fragments as well as to documents. I've been >pondering this in connection to some object store ideas I had while writing >that Building the Filesystem into the File paper a few months ago. > >'Documents' in the traditional sense are still popular, but I don't know how >much longer we'll really be working with them. I think fragments, subsets, >and combinations are going to be much more popular in the reasonably near >future. > >Compound documents and partial validation are a fact of life, or will be once >XML, XLink, and XPointer receive more widespread usage. I think we can >prepare XSchemas to support these (partial validation is easier) without >turning somersaults and cartwheels simultaneously. > >Simon St.Laurent >Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies > > >xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... >Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ >To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >(un)subscribe xml-dev >To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >subscribe xml-dev-digest >List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...) ProRec- Nederland Gerard Freriks,huisarts, MD C. Sterrenburgstr 54 3151JG Hoek van Holland the Netherlands Telephone: (+31) (0)174-384296/ Fax: -386249 Mobile : (+31) (0)6-54792800 ARS LONGA, VITA BREVIS xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|