[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: words (RE: extensibility in XSchema?)
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Trevor Turton wrote: > This sounds accurate to me - > anyone else have a sharp definition of sentacs versus symantix? No, I do not believe that such a sharp definition exists. That does not mean that we can wave a magic wand and have the concepts disappear, however. Even without precise definitions, the words are useful and important. If, in the real world, we threw away every word that did not have a mathematical definition, we would not have many words left. Since XML lives on the border of the "real world" of human thoughts and ideas and the quasi-mathematical world of the computer, we must expect to deal with both that which is well-defined and that which is fuzzy. Paul Prescod xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|