[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSchema: multiple proposals
>All of which leads me to wonder if is there an (as yet undiscovered) way to >represent XML content models in XML without using the basic structure: Frankly, I would like to see separate definitions for each element, attributes, and containment rules. I hated nested procedures in Pascal so I hate having to define objects inside another definition. Same thing happened with XSL where they mixed pattern definition and action rules together so that patterns nor rules can't be shared. Other than that, I am enjoying the stampede. Don Park http://www.docuverse.com/personal/index.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|