[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSchema Question 1: RDF
Tim Bray wrote: > In fact *every* attempt so far > (the old DSD stuff, XML-Data, etc) to express content models in XML has > come up verbose and unreadable compared to good ol' 8879 DTD notation. > I think there's a better way, and want to see what xml-dev can come up > with. -Tim Regardless of whether XSchema rivals DTD notation for brevity and clarity, we still need it. The compelling reason for XSchema is not besting the readability of DTD notation -- a visual schema editor is far clearer than both -- but making schema information available through XML tools (which are numerous) rather than DTD tools (which are not). For this reason, I would vote against directly using RDF in XSchema, as it means we will have designed something we can't use. -- Ron Bourret xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|