[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Open standards processes
At 14:31 01/05/98 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote: >So the XML effort had three levels: "Voting members", "Influential >non-voting experts" and "XML-DEV" and the DOM effort has essentially two >levels "voting members" and "non-influential, non-voting experts" and you >see that as more open? How so? I don't think equating lack of voting rights and lack of influence is fair in terms of the DOM work. Just as in the XML SIG, where what was said was read and discussed by members of the XML WG, so are all postings to www-dom read and discussed by members of the DOM WG. Not all postings get direct replies, but the influence on the specs has been large. The people who take the time to read the specs and post to the www-dom list are not being ignored. Those who are interested in the current DOM discussions will find the archives for www-dom at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/ Lauren xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|