[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX: Distributed Implementations
I agree with Dave Brownell about the distribution issues. The only advantage I see for having a language-neutral SAX is having a parser, say written in C, called from a client written, say in Java, all in the same machine (and probably the same process). There are not that many pairs of interest (to me, I'm a Java programmer), so I'd *much rather* put the burden on the implementor of the parser, or of the translation layer, than on the client. I.e. I'd *much rather* have a SAX/Java that mix best with Java than a language-neutral SAX. Of course, it depends on what your goals are. - eduardo xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|