[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX: Error Reporting (question 4 of 10)

  • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 08:51:27 +0700

fatal error in java
Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> James Clark wrote:
> >
> > I feel pretty strongly that the right way to handle fatal XML errors in
> > Java in a production-oriented interface is with an exception and that
> > SAX needs to define an exception to cover fatal XML errors. The
> > exception should extend IOException so that it works with the
> > java.net.ContentHandler stuff.
> 
> It seems very easy to map from a notWellFormed event to a notWellFormed
> exception and essentially impossible to map from the exception back into
> an event (with context etc.).

Not at all.  The exception can carry all the context that an event does
(like URL, line number and so on).  An exception can easily be mapped to
an event:

parser.setApp(app);
try {
  parser.run();
}
catch (XmlNotWellFormedException e) {
  parser.fatalError(e);
}

You can't generate more than one fatal error event with this approach,
but that seems well out of the scope of a simple interface like SAX.

Apart from the fact that it is the right thing to do (show me a Java API
that uses a callback for a fatal error), there are two other reasons why
throwing an exception is the right approach:

- Representing information about the error as an object allows much
better extensibility: implementations can extend
XmlNotWellFormedException to provide richer error reporting, and this
can be very conveniently exploited by applications.

- A parser will read from a URL, thus it is already the case that it
will generate IOExceptions, and thus applications have to be prepared to
deal with this already. (I hope nobody is suggesting that the parser
should try to catch IOExceptions.)  By deriving
XmlNotWellFormedException from IOException, an application doesn't have
to right any additional code to deal with fatal errors.

The fact that a parser needs to be able to throw IOExceptions makes
deriving the parser interface from Runnable unworkable, because run
can't throw any checked exceptions. Instead an app would need to create
its own runnable that calls the parser inside a try statement, and
catches and deals with any IOExceptions.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.