[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization

• From: Wendell Piez <marcus@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 13:46:01 -0500

FWIW, this is quoted from a page currently on the Microsoft site:
http://www.microsoft.com/msdn/news/drgui/102097.htm --

> Tags may be ended in one of three ways. As in HTML, <TAG> is ended by
> </TAG>. Since XML is strict about proper nesting, you can also end the 
> innermost tag with </>, which is much simpler....

I suppose this may result from nothing more nefarious than confusion
within Microsoft with regard to what makes legal XML. But might not such
confusion be consequential if and as it spills into the marketplace?

Or is this copy merely out of date? (The file name suggests it was keyed
in October.) Is it still a live question whether Microsoft applications
and/or guidelines will be fostering the deployment of "XML" repositories
using tag minimization? I browsed this page today, Dec. 29 1997.

Respectfully,
Wendell Piez
HuskyLabs
wendell@l...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: IDL?
• Next by Date: RE: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Previous by thread: attlistdecl (nmtoken vs attvalue) in enumeration
• Next by thread: RE: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread