[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 13:51:29 +1100

 
> From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>

> The </> minimisation is used in the DSO examples that come with msxml 1.8
> and still parse with msxml.
> 
> >Thanks for catching the error.  That copy is out-of-date.  I'll send a note
> >to Dr. Gui and ask for it to be fixed.

Why call this an error?  Why not just clearly label it as syntax which is
not valid or WF XML, but can be allowed in SGML. That way people know
it is not strange or naughty to use it if they need to, it is just not XML.
So take it out of the XML examples, but not the msxml parser (or put it in
a conditional section to allow a parser called "mssgml" as well from the 
same code base). 

The idea that one syntax (i.e. XML) is good for all documents is as
bad as saying that there can be one DTD for all documents. SGML allows
many variant syntaxes, and even its labarynths don't go nearly far
enough to give everyone what they need. XML is a good markup syntax
for the rest of us, but not the answer to all needs.


Rick Jelliffe

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: IDL?
• Next by Date: Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Previous by thread: RE: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Next by thread: Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread