[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: IDL?
At 07:42 AM 12/27/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote: >* David's Model: > > PARSER --> SAX-J --> DOM --> [tree-based user application] > | > --------------> [event-based user application] > >In other words, a DOM builder would be just another an event-based >SAX-J application. This is precisely the way I see it. For those who think we need something simpler than the DOM, please explain what it is that you would supply, and how it is simpler than the DOM. To me, the part of the DOM that deals with elements and attributes seems about as simple as you can get. For those who think that web hackers can't grok the DOM, can web hackers grok dynamic HTML? Didn't the DOM start out as a way to do a browser-independent version of dynamic HTML? Yes, it has added functionality since then, but I think that the part of the DOM that web hackers need is also easily understood by web hackers. On the other hand, better documentation for this subset would be useful, but the standard isn't finished yet... Jonathan jonathan@t... Texcel Research http://www.texcel.no xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|