[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Plug and Play XML

• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: "xml-dev Mailing List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:14:36 +0900

Rick Jelliffe writes:
>When is each appropriate?  I think the idea is to use text/xml in the 
>normal case, and application/xml as a fallback

I believe that this is the idea of the XML WG and also the idea of W3C.  
However, it is still not cleary presented in the XML PR.

Rick Jelliffe writes:
>I think I first suggested it, but it certainly was not my preferred 
>option: I would prefer everything to be application/xml, because I do
>not like the idea of dumb HTTP/MIME systems fiddling and transcoding data,
>which they may do for text/xml. Application/xml is a binary transmission;
>no bits are molested en route.

You might want to try this once again in the XML SIG.  If everybody agrees 
on this, I am more than happy to agree.  But I do not want to have 
both text/xml and application/xml for HTTP, as this is likely to confuse 
people.  Is it possible to persuade people *not* to use text/xml?

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Plug and Play XML
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • Re: Plug and Play XML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Plug and Play XML
• Next by Date: Re: Plug and Play XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Plug and Play XML
• Next by thread: Re: Plug and Play XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread