[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: do we ever need a test suite?
In fact, SGMLOpen has begun to gather preliminary requirements for such a test suite. A subcommittee has been formed as part of the technical committee and chartered with the task of developing a set of conformance criteria and test suites for XML processors. If anyone on this list is a member of SGMLOpen (or an employee of a member company or organization) your input would be greatly appreciated. Mary McRae Tim Bray wrote: >I am working on the last missing pieces in Lark (PE processing, yecch), and >is it ever becoming obvious that we need a test suite. Michael >Sperberg-McQueen made a few beginnings on this some time back, producing >the invaluable torture.xml (can *your* parser do that one?). I remember >that way back when, Omnimark produced this massive SGML test suite >on CD-ROM as I recall. If someone wanted to do the same for XML, they'd >be doing the world a service, and there might even be some money in it. >-Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|