[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: NOTATION/MIME (was Re: Recent XML WG decisions)

• From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 11:05:12 -0400

[Rick Jelliffe]
> [Peter Murray-Rust]
> > Being picky, this is not valid XML since prod [74] requires a
> > SystemLiteral as well as the PubidLiteral.
> 
> Yep.  And do the < and > have to be entity references too in XML?
> 
> Yep, XML does not support "formal" system identifiers as I
> understand it.  I think it is a shame, since there are things that
> are not URLs that would be nice as identifiers, even in web systems.
> But support for FSIs can be retrofitted at some later stage to XML.
> I hope there is no chance of them being added to XML 1.0.  But I
> hope people keep FSIs in mind as a good way to ramp up the power of
> URIs and other identifiers in the near future, in particular for
> selecting particular system identifier notations (schemas).

FSIs were discussed at the beginning.  A decision was made that they
were better left for later, and I agree.

A decision was also made that all system identifiers would have an
implicit FSI identifier of <URL>, which I also think is usually a good
idea.  This allows FSIs to be added later, and any unlabeled system ID
is implied to have <URL>.

What I was suggesting on the SIG was that for system identifiers in
notation declarations, the assumed FSI label would be <mimetype>.  As
Rick pointed out, this is legal HyTime 2 FSI notation, and would be
very useful.  However, the WG has made its decision.

I believe that XML authors are largely going to refer to images simply
by URLs instead of entities; in that case, file system associations or
HTTP headers can be used to ascertain the entity's type.  In cases
where NDATA entities are used, I would recommend that XML implementors
ignore the system identifier of the notation, and make their decision
based on the entity itself.

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NOTATION/MIME (was Re: Recent XML WG decisions)
    • From: Peter Newcomb <peter@t...>

• References:
  • Re: NOTATION/MIME (was Re: Recent XML WG decisions)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Microsoft's XSL Proposal
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's XSL Proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: NOTATION/MIME (was Re: Recent XML WG decisions)
• Next by thread: Re: NOTATION/MIME (was Re: Recent XML WG decisions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread