[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DTD invented by Microsoft?!
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > Len writes: > > > This appears to be the long awaited and somewhat dreaded > > attempt to use instance syntax for type definitions. It > > is an idea that has been floated several times on the > > XML WG list and generally resisted. > > It was resisted, correctly in my view, as a component of XML-lang > itself, and in the decision the point was made several times that the > right place for this was one level up, as a generic application. > That's what the schema proposal in the XML-data document is aimed at > providing. > > > > > It is a bad idea and may be the reason SGML community > > members finally withdraw from XML development. > > I'd be interested to hear your reasons for thinking it's a bad idea -- Why do we need two ways to do the same thing? Rick Jeliffe provided the example in the SGML DTD syntax we know now. If simplicity is the goal, why introduce this now? len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|