[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Property Set
In message <01BC7EB7.10467860.jtauber@j...> "James K. Tauber" writes: > > About a month ago I started making a list of those classes and properties > from the SGML Property Set that were appropriate to XML. I got through > about half of the classes the first night and then didn't touch it until > now. > > With all this talk about XML groves, it is worth me finishing off the list? In my grove-illiterate opinion, yes! The PropertySet is a sword of Damocles hanging over these discussions. It's clear that we can't have all 70+ properties. IF (and I hope it's not a big IF) we can agree on a subset of the property set then we don't have this problem dissipating the discussion every time we get close :-) James Clark came up with a grove subset about 3 months back (have a look in March xml-dev) in response to one of my typical blunderings for information. It looked simple (I can't tell if it was comprehensive) and imagine it is fairly close to what we require. Unfortunately no-one seemed to take it up. So do JamesC and JamesT converge on a common solution? If they do, why not freeze this as an alpha version of the propertySubSet...?? P. -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|